Background Radiation Has Increased 600 Percent - 1 mSv In 1950 To over 6 mSv In 2014; Where Is This Coming From?
from a distance August 9, 2015 And here you have it. Proof that these dangerous radionuclides were not in the world prior to nuclear energy, etc. ->
The pro-nukes have a hard time grasping that simple fact.
"CESIUM-137 AND OTHER GAMMA RADIOACTIVITY IN THE FLORIDA ENVIRONMENT - A STUDY OF SELECTED MEDIA" by CHARLES ERVIN ROESSLER"Eisenbud points out that the world Inventory of radioactive materials prior to World War II, both In the environment and in the laboratory, was confined to those which occurred in nature, with the exception of a relatively few millicuries of radioactivity produced in cyclotrons during the late 1930's. Construction of large nuclear reactors during the war and the associated operations for extracting plutonium from irradiated uranium resulted in the first extensive occasions for contaminating the environment with radioactive substances."
Source: http://ufdcimages.uflib.ufl.edu/UF/00/09/82/13/00001/cesium137otherga00roes.pdf
DR BUSBY SAYS BACKGROUND RADIATION INCREASING GLOBALLY DUE TO NUCLEAR INDUSTRY
Dr. Chris Busby and other nuclear professionals discuss how the background radiation is increasing all over the globe due to the huge radiation releases, leaks and nuclear plant accidents year after year of radioactive man made elements.
The 'maximum' radiation no civilian should be exposed to has now been raised by orders of magnitude since 1975, to a whopping 1 m/Sv per year. But even this is not enough, because Fukushima released an estimated 50 times the radiation of Chernobyl, thus massively increasing the background radiation globally, and especially in Japan. But the general allowed maximum background level does not include the above amounts which can be found in contaminated foods and drinks.
The increase in background radiation documented below is due to DU weapons, nuclear plant accidents, plutonium releases, uranium mining and many other sources, most of which are kept secret, hidden or covered up. http://www.llrc.org
To view radiation levels this week, click on link for article that shows very high CPM readings all across the US, without even a nuclear accident happening. These radiation readings come from EPA monitors, but they have not always been this high. Where did all of this radiation come from? http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/04/17/your-radiation-this-week-3/
ON THE BEACH MOVIE CLIP
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kc7y8xs6QXw&feature=youtu.be
A short movie clip from the movie On The Beach , about background radiation increasing.. This is pretty close to how concerned everyone SHOULD be about background radiation levels increasing. The nuclear industry has done a really good PR job of making everyone very comfortable with a global increase of 60,000% in background radiation, since the beginning of the atomic age.
Nuke Professional talks about how much of the 'figuring' about 'natural' background radiation is actually a lie.. He provides a very simple, easy to read pie graph and explains how this lie works..
http://nukeprofessional.blogspot.com/p/baseline-is-just-one-of-lies.html
Bottom line, 'natural' background radiation has not increased over time. If anything, due to the decaying radioactive elements, the background radiation should slowly be going down and reducing over time.
FUKUSHIMA INCREASED AIRBORNE AND OCEAN RADIATION LEVELS BY 2 TO 3 ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE, MORTALITY INCREASED BY HUGE AMOUNTS SINCE BEGINNING OF ATOMIC AGE
Trend of mortality rate from pancreatic cancer in Japan (Males) for the period prior to and following the release of fission products into the environment."
From M. Segi, M. Kurihara, and T. Matsuyama, "Cancer Mortality in Japan (1899-1962)", Department of Public Health, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan, 1965. http://www.berkeleycitizen.org/radiation/radiation1.htm
INCREASE FROM ZERO BACKGROUND RADIATION IN THE 30's WAS ZERO CPM; AFTER CHERNOBYL IT WAS 2 CPM, AFTER FUKUSHIMA IT IS NOW 17 CPM
bo March 29, 2015 What one considers is 'frying' is subjective. But here's an old post from ISeePinkClouds... I think this is precious information that gives perspective on raising background levels, as he's been measuring radiation since the 70s, in the same location:
In the 70's and 80's "Background" Radiation measured zero counts per minute. If I received a count it might be within five minutes.
After Chernobyl I would receive two or three counts every five minutes. If there is such a thing as "Natural Background Radiation", it was very, very low here in West Texas.
Today in the same area I am reading about 18.8 counts per minute.
In July it was 15.1 counts per minute.
None of this is "Natural Background Radiation". It is from Chernobyl, Fukushima, the WIPP, and possibly now from the Ukraine.
In light of the fact that there have been twelve hundred above ground Nuclear Detonations in the United States, I do not believe that one can find "Natural Background Radiation" anywhere in the United States."
Via Bill Duff November 10, 2014 Contaminated air masses from Fukushima, globally enhanced airborne 137Cs levels by 2 to 3 orders of magnitudeEnvironmental Science Technology (American Chemical Society), Published Sept. 3, 2013: Size Distributions of Airborne Radionuclides from the Fukushima Nuclear Accident at Several Places in Europe Before the FDNPP accident, average 137Cs levels were typically of 1
↧